Skip to content | Change text size
 

Faculty Policy Bank

Course and Unit Viability Annual Review policy

Purpose

To provide a framework about the annual review of courses and units with low enrolments in the Faculty.

Scope

This policy applies to all coursework programs managed by the Faculty. In addition, this policy applies to all coursework and research unit offerings.

Policy Statement

The Faculty will evaluate the viability of its programs and units using an agreed set of indicators and referenced against Faculty and University objectives.

Membership of the Review Panel

The Deputy Dean, Education, will establish a review panel each year consisting of:

  • Associate Dean (Undergraduate) – Panel Chair;
  • Heads of Departments or nominee/s;
  • Course Directors;
  • Heads of Schools where relevant;
  • Finance Manager; and
  • Faculty Manager or nominee/s.

Course Viability

Courses making less than 20 offers in the VTAC selection are referred to the review process.

In addition, any program with a commencing load of less than 20 EFTSL, or that which is deemed in some other way no longer relevant, will be referred to the review panel.

The panel makes an assessment of the program, in conjunction with returning EFTSL and total load EFTSL data.

The panel may, at its discretion, vary the EFTSL criteria for Graduate/Postgraduate programs.

The criteria for determination include:

  • educational considerations;
  • financial considerations;
  • strategic importance to the Faculty and/or the University;
  • role in double degrees or other combinations; and
  • period of time course been offered (with a three year honeymoon period for new courses).

The recommendation to discontinue or disestablish the course is made by the Course and Unit Viability Review panel.

Unit Viability

The criteria for unit viability is 20 enrolments for every unit offering option for the lowest paying unit. The panel will review unit viability with regard to the number of times the unit is offered, campus of offering and mode of offering.

The criteria for determination include:

  • educational considerations;
  • financial considerations;
  • strategic importance of the unit to the Department and/or the Faculty;
  • frequency of offering;
  • campus of offering; and
  • mode of offering.

The panel proposes a recommendation to the Faculty Education Committee regarding the retention or disestablishment of units.

The Faculty Education Committee makes a recommendation on retention or disestablishment of units.

If the panel recommends the unit be disestablished, the Head of Department may submit a response to Faculty Education Committee as to why the unit should be retained using the relevant criteria for determination.

 

Supporting Procedures

Course and Unit Viability Annual Review procedures

Responsiblity for implementation

Associate Dean (Undergraduate)
Group Manager, Academic Services
Finance Manager
Executive Officer, Management Information Systems
Academic Governance Unit

Status

New

Key Stakeholders

Dean
Deputy Dean, Education
Associate Dean (Undergraduate)
Heads of Department
Course Directors
Heads of Departments
Heads of Schools (where relevant)
Group Manager Academic Services
Finance Manager
Faculty Manager
Academic Governance Unit
Curriculum Data Services

Approval Body

Council, Academic Board or Vice-Chancellor’s Group
Meeting number:
Meeting date:
Agenda item:

Endorsement Body

Faculty Board
Meeting number: 1/09
Meeting date: 11 March 2009
Agenda item: 7.4

Faculty Board
Meeting number: 4/09
Meeting date: 12 August 2009
Agenda item: 7.8

Definitions

EFTSL Equivalent Full-Time Student Load: a measure of the study load, for a year, of a student undertaking a course of study on a full time basis

VTAC Victorian Tertiary Admissions Centre

Related Legislation

 

Related Policies

 

Related Documents

 

Date Effective

1 August 2009

Review Date

December 2010

Owner

Faculty of Business and Economics

Author

Academic Governance Unit

Contact Person

Academic Governance Unit
Email: secretariat@buseco.monash.edu.au